Moore, Swift, Minster, Mellers, Ungar, Tetlock, & Yang.  Confidence and accuracy over time.  Unpublished.  

Moore, D. A., Carter, A., & Yang, H. Underprecision in Judgments of Known Probability Distributions. Unpublished.

Benjamin, D., Moore, D. A., & Rabin, M. Misconceptions of chance: Evidence from an integrated experiment.  Unpublished.

Cain, D., Moore, D. A., & Haran, U. (in press) Making sense of overconfidence in market entry. Strategic Management Journal.

Benoit, J. P., Dubra, J., & Moore, D. A. (in press).  Does the Better-Than-Average Effect Show That People Are Overconfident?: Two Experiments.  Journal of the European Economic Association.

Moore, D. A., Tenney, E. R., & Haran, U. (in press).  Overprecision in judgment.  In G. Wu and G. Keren (Eds.), Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making.  New York: Wiley

Kennedy, J. A., Anderson, C., & Moore, D. A. (2013). When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 266–279.

Mannes, A., & Moore, D. A. (2013).  A behavioral demonstration of overconfidence in judgment.  Psychological Science.

Swift, S. A., Moore, D. A., Sharek, Z. S., & Gino, F.  (2013).  Inflated applicants: Attribution errors in performance evaluation by professionals.  PLoS One.  

Moore, D. A., Swift, S. A., Sharek, Z. S., & Gino, F. (2010). Correspondence bias in performance evaluation: Why grade inflation works.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 843-852. 

Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502-517.

Moore, D. A. & Cain, D. M. (2007).  Overconfidence and underconfidence: When and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 197-213.

Moore, D. A., & Small, D. A. (2007).  Error and bias in comparative judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 972-989.

.

.

There are two conditions of using anything here: 

1. If you find an error, please tell me about it. 

2. If you want to publish any analyses on data you obtain here, the original set of authors on the project have the right to be included as co-authors on the new paper.

Thanks.